You're viewing a comment by fulano and its responses.
You're viewing a comment by fulano and its responses.
I am being sponsored by Syntress! They bought me an amazing dedicated server to run catonmat on. If you're looking web services, I highly recommend the Syntress guys!
I am being sponsored by A-Writer! If you ever need help with essay writing, look no further than A-Writer! They will help you with your writing in as quickly as 3 hours!
I love to read science books. They make my day and I get ideas for awesome blog posts, such as Busy Beaver, On Functors, Recursive Regular Expressions and many others.
Take a look at my
Amazon wish list, if you're curious about what I have planned reading next, and want to surprise me. :)
If you are interested in advertising on catonmat.net, contact me.
Free tools for coding on Vietstarsoft.com.
Programming homework help.


Agreed. However,
a) inheritance and virtual functions
b) function overloading
c) templates
are all built-in mechanisms for the *creation* of new polymorphic components in a C++ program. These casts simply *are* polymorphic components: you have no means of extending the set.
You could argue that you can use them (especially the void*) to create new polymorphic components, but then *I* wouldn't call it a built-in mechanism any more (it becomes a Turing-trivial argument).
Still, I appreciate the observation. I hadn't thought of the casts in this light before.
Reply To This Comment