You're replying to a comment by Ilia.

October 13, 2012, 05:58

1. It looks weird, that you are taking the second column of history output with cut, instead of doing that inside of awk block. (in your "top 10" example)

2. I think that awk is an overkill for the common task of counting the number of entries. The same can be done a la "| sort | uniq -c | sort -nr". I think that this code snippet is much easier to remember than the line of awk code, even though it performs worse.

Reply To This Comment

(why do I need your e-mail?)

(Your twitter handle, if you have one.)

Type the word "lcd_334": (just to make sure you're a human)

Please preview the comment before submitting to make sure it's OK.