You're viewing a comment by dasuxullebt and its responses.
You're viewing a comment by dasuxullebt and its responses.
I am being sponsored by Syntress since 2007! They bought me an amazing dedicated server to run catonmat on. If you're looking web services in Chicago area, I highly recommend the Syntress guys!
I love to read science books. They make my day and I get ideas for awesome blog posts, such as Busy Beaver, On Functors, Recursive Regular Expressions and many others.
Take a look at my
Amazon wish list, if you're curious about what I have planned reading next, and want to surprise me. :)


Very nice idea to plot this as graphics. Very interesting (even in general).
Using linear-speedup and dynamic recompilation, one could write a quite fast Turing-Machine-Emulator. Would be nice if someone would do that - but well, not very useful, even for TCS meanwhile. Still, this problem is not bound to Turing-Machines. In fact, something similar can be defined for any turing-complete Programming Language. And even for weaker (or stronger) machine models this type of problem (namely giving some upper bound of the time a program runs) can be formulated - thats basically what the ackermann-function is for loop-machines or typed lambda-closures. Basically, it is equivalent to the Halting Problem.
@Casey: The Tape of the Turing Machine can content 0 and 1. Initially, infinitely many 0's, but the algorithm can write 1's on it. Should be clear then.
Oh, and well ... who ever hosts this blog: Please add some possibility to subscribe to comments.
Reply To This Comment