You're replying to a comment by Paolo.

November 06, 2008, 11:28

First of all: I'm biased, I have such a profound admiration for EWD that my judgments will be clouded, so I'm not going to make any of them. ;-) On the other hand, I'd like to help clarify few things.

@Chris Koo

He had a very clear ideas of what elegance is for him. Not only in programming, but in everything involves thinking; this paper should clarify what he meant with elegance, or better, with mathematical elegance:
or (HTML version)

This one is a bit longer, but even more explicit, still on the topic of mathematical elegance:
or (HTML version)


More than "spranging from Zeus' head", a metaphor that would describe the way he wrote programs is that he was building up mathematical proofs; in fact, more than a metaphore, it is truth. His research involved deeply axiomatic formal methods of programming. To get a feel of what it involves you can check out this very long paper:
or (HTML version)

Reply To This Comment

(why do I need your e-mail?)

(Your twitter handle, if you have one.)

Type the word "unix_102": (just to make sure you're a human)

Please preview the comment before submitting to make sure it's OK.